February 8th, 2014
Street Style

Chic And Practical

© Tommy Ton for style.com

A reader commented that she prefers the Saint Laurent sneakers to the Stan Smith Adidas, and I may have to agree. Regardless, thank goodness trainers are chic right now, hard to navigate snowbanks in heels…

Both images © Tommy Ton for style.com

SHOP

what's new

GUCCI

Loafers

MARNI

Pocket Bandoleer bag

CHLOÉ

Lace-up corduroy shirt

CHLOÉ

Corduroy trousers

BALENCIAGA

Small tote

VICTORIA, VICTORIA BECKHAM

Wool-Blend pants

ALTUZARRA

Shirtdress

MARNI

Wool-blend sweater

GUCCI

Marmont loafers

MARNI

Printed silk dress

VALENTINO

Mary-Jane pumps

view all

  • I’m assuming these pics were shot in NYC? I hate to be even more practical, but as a faithful reader in Chicago the first thing I noticed is that neither of these women is wearing socks/hose/tights. Yesterday our high was 10 with a wind chill of -20. While I’m very anti-nude hose, frostbite is not good either.

    kimFebruary 8th, 2014  4:43 PM

     
  • I prefer them as well – so sleek, with perfectly clean lines.

    KathyFebruary 8th, 2014  6:18 PM

     
  • Hmmm . . . $75 Adidas or $570 Saint Laurent? I’m not always price driven, but on this one, the Adidas seem to be the choice for me.

    Tori MordecaiFebruary 8th, 2014  8:32 PM

     
  • The Saint Laurent are beautiful but I’m sticking with the Adidas, and I received the newsletter today that they’re available so can’t wait!
    XO

    SueMFebruary 8th, 2014  8:48 PM

     
  • I have been looking for the all white womens Stan Smith Adidas to no avail. Even Adidas on line does not have them, where can I find them, I love this look!

    Julie CFebruary 9th, 2014  2:00 AM

     
  • Chic right now? I think they are either perennially chic or not chic at all. I am in the latter school of thought.

    diedreFebruary 9th, 2014  3:58 AM

     
  • The Saint Laurent trainers are more streamlined than the Stan Smiths – and both are better than heels!

    That's Not My AgeFebruary 9th, 2014  6:47 AM

     
  • Julie…I have been searching for the Stan Smith’s as well and discovered that they won’t be back on the market until closer to Spring. I’m thinking March perhaps?

    kimFebruary 9th, 2014  11:24 AM

     
  • Just saw the Stan Smith’s available at addidas.ca but unfortunately only in sizes 9 and 11. Still might look around for a passable facsimile. I’m sure if it’s not out there yet, it will be soon.

    Sue B @highheelsinthewilderness.blogspot.caFebruary 9th, 2014  12:01 PM

     
  • I agree with Tori, the price difference is just too great to justify going with the Saint Laurent version. If you are after super streamlined, Muji has a pair of trainers that fit the bill. Or there is always Superga. Granted neither one are leather, but the plus side is that they are also a lot lighter than Stan Smiths which makes them easier to spend the day in.

    PouletteFebruary 9th, 2014  3:39 PM

     
  • The Saint Laurent are of course preferable, but for the incremental $500 – the Stan Smith are worth the compromise.

    DianaFebruary 9th, 2014  3:54 PM

     
  • Love that stylish women are wearing trainers as a chic messy weather option. The saint Laurent ones are a great option if money is no object! Love them! Still, would I wear them in the slushy snow ? I don’t think so! Too pretty when they are clean!

    PaulaFebruary 9th, 2014  5:11 PM

     
  • Love your eye for street style. The casual looks inspire me the most.

    TanishaFebruary 10th, 2014  1:05 AM

     
  • K Swiss makes a great pair called clean classic, and for only $70 they are a no brainer! Check them out:
    http://www.kswiss.com/shop/footwear/92874-156/Women/Clean_Classic/WHITE_STINGRAY/tree

    TanishaFebruary 15th, 2014  11:44 AM

     

Please be courteous. All comments are moderated. Preachy comments about body weight, age, smoking, and furs will not be posted.

Name :

Email (will not be published) :

Sign up here for email alerts.